-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
generators: Default is a valid enum value #407
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: apelisse The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
f0cd309
to
a54eb54
Compare
return fmt.Errorf("failed to generate default in %v: %v: %v", parent, m.Name, err) | ||
} | ||
if def != nil { | ||
g.Do("Default: $.$,\n", *def) | ||
if enumType, isEnum := g.enumContext.EnumType(m.Type); isEnum && !enumType.IsValid(*def) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this check be part of generateDefault
implementation instead? Just wondering since it is called from multiple places and might be cleaner that way
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would mean we would have to push even more parameters to generateDefault
, I don't have a strong opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I don't see IsValid
being called in other places?
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@alexzielenski I don't have much context on this, is it something we still want to get in? |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Fixes #395
This makes sure that the default value is part of the enum values, which makes sense. We shouldn't have a default that doesn't validate. There are probably a lot of other thing that don't exist right now but will exist in the future that we might want to validate for (maximum/minimum comes to mind). I'm also a little confused how we can have a default for a required value, we might want to disallow that.